A Tory for Speaker? (plus an Ireland mini-update)

I decided against blogging last week about the new Ontario cabinet in part because it wasn’t very exciting news – no defectors à la Belinda to give the Libs a majority, no new names in cabinet – and also because three (posts), as they say, is the magic number.

Had I written the aforementioned would-be post, I would have included a second viable option: encouraging a member of the opposition to run for Speaker, sort of like, well, this news item on Frank Klees (Progressive Conservative, Newmarket-Aurora), a member of the opposition who’s decided to run for Speaker.

I would have preferred a defection because that would have been much more fun. My favourite candidate (everyone else’s too, I’d guess) was Elizabeth Witmer, because I think she’s the last Red Tory left in Ontario and she must cringe every time she thinks, “I serve in caucus with Randy Hillier,” but alas, no, Witmer stays in as Tory health critic.

What irks me is that some news outlets are reporting that, should Klees become Speaker, the OLP would have a majority. Not to put too fine a point on it, but that’s not accurate. Should Klees win, there would be a 53-53 tie in the Ontario legislature; however, as we saw when federal Speaker Peter Milliken voted in favour of the Paul Martin minority government, it is an established principle that the Speaker always votes for continuance of the legislature.

So, as I see it, Klees as Speaker would be obliged to vote in favour of the government on a tie vote on matters of confidence and supply, but would be free to oppose other government legislation, the defeat of which would not cause the government to fall. In other words, it’s still a minority of one, only one Tory sits on his hands for money bills like the budget, confidence motions, etc.

It’s partly true that I like this idea because of its inherent Machiavellian appeal – Klees refused the shadow cabinet jobs he was offered, which seems to signal internal PC dissent – but our previous era of CPC minority rule federally suggests defensible reasons for the Ontario Liberal MPPs to stand aside in favour of Klees.

First, Ontario has voted three times in a year (municipal, federal, provincial in that order). Enough already. Give us a few years of stability. The electorate is annoyed. Turnout is down. Party workers are exhausted and some of us are trying to rehabilitate our reputations, thank you very much.

Second, during its half-decade as a minority government, the federal Tories rarely sought consensus. Instead Harper and crew practised political brinkmanship by gambling that one or another of the opposition parties, usually the Liberals, would so not want an election as to give them a free pass. That’s not leadership – it’s playing games.

Speaking of, both Hudak and Horwath demonstrated ably why they lost the provincial election by their antics after E-Day. It didn’t matter what approaches McGuinty made to the two other party leaders; it would never be enough for a meaningful agreement. Contrast to Peterson and Rae after the 1985 vote. Whether or not he actually wants to work with the opposition leaders, McGuinty seemed to do what’s right in opening up a discussion that Hudak and Horwath dismissed out of hand.

Look, I opposed the McGuinty government openly on a few issues in its second term, but really, the PC and NDP campaigns were crappy. Somehow the NDP managed to lose a quarter of Jack’s Ontario supporters between May and October while Hudak pulled a John Tory and, instead of letting McGuinty’s OLP defeat itself, the PCPO came out of the gate offending many with all that “foreign workers” gabble.

The PC campaign was truly an example of snatching defeat from the jaws of victory, and I’m slightly amazed that Hudak still has a job. My point is, neither opposition party has a mandate for bringing down the government right now.

Oh yes, I know that the Liberals won a very narrow plurality of the popular vote, but the federal Tories have drummed into us for years their mantra that if you come first, you’ve won, no matter what the numbers, so the PCPO can’t really fall back on the minority argument and it’s not like they could feasibly form a coalition with the New Democrats. (Anyway, remember what Harper taught us: coalitions are evil.)

But I’m not giving the government a free pass either: my fear is that McGuinty will use those Harper-ish brinkmanship tactics in seeking to prevent his government’s fall, rather than a more positive goal of seeking consensus in a minority parliament. The PCs are intransigent as always but I still want to believe that Grits and Dippers can get along if they try.

Anyway, if I were Premier McGuinty I’d three-line-whip my members into not standing for Speaker. The previous (and rather good) Speaker, Steve Peters, retired at the last election, so it’s not as if this would kick a standing Speaker out of his chair. Besides, renegade Tories sometimes make excellent Speakers and, uh, future Liberals (Gary Carr, I’m looking at you).

***

In all the excitement (it isn’t really that exciting) surrounding the race for important post of President of the Republic of Ireland (it isn’t really that important), I totally forgot about the by-election in Dublin West to be held on the same day, October 27.

The by-election was caused by the sudden death of former minister and deputy leader of Fianna Fáil, Brian Lenihan, Jnr. Lenihan was last elected back in February on the fifth count without reaching the quota and until his death was Fianna Fáil’s last surviving Dublin TD.

Nominally the seat should be Labour’s to lose, according to the general election results, as Joan Burton was elected on the first count with her running mate Patrick Nulty – Labour’s candidate in the by-election – losing to Lenihan on the last count.

Back in the day, Dublin West reliably voted in two Fianna Fáil TDs but of course this is a by-election, so Ireland’s single transferable vote system operates like an Australian alternative vote instead, and anyway, all those old rules and assumptions were thrown out the window with FF’s decimation, right? (But if that’s the case, why does Seán Gallagher look dead certain to win the bloody presidency?)

Dublin West’s other TDs are the Socialist Party leader, Joe Higgins, and Fine Gael minister Leo Varadkar. It would be a blow to the coalition government if anyone other than Ethne Loftus (FG) or Nulty should end up winning the by-election.

I suppose it’s possible that sympathy for Lenihan might boost Fianna Fáil’s vote, but I doubt it, and it’s not like when Lenihan himself ran to succeed his deceased father – the Lenihan family was approached but declined to run one of their own to replace Brian Jnr.

If there is a substantial increase in the FF vote, I’m blaming it on Gallagher’s Trojan Horse run, but my money’s still on Labour to win despite a few bad poll results, with an outside change that Socialist Ruth Coppinger takes it based on recent polls showing smaller parties (including the United Left Alliance, of which the SP is key part) on a whopping 22%.

 

Fianna Fáil in an independent’s clothing

UPDATE (28 October): According to all the usual sources (RTE, Irish Times, Journal), there is every indication that Michael D. Higgins will be elected to the presidency. Huge swing away from Gallagher because of, well, what I wrote below. As my friend @Chasaveen rightly points out, whereas the words “Fianna Fáil” did NOT scare voters, the word “bagman” caused the electorate to collectively recoil.

An RTE telephone poll found that 17% of all voters switched their preference in the last week of the campaign – since the Frontline debate widely seen as won by Higgins and McGuinness and lost by Gallagher – away from Gallagher. Of those, two-thirds went to Higgins. If the poll is correct, a whopping 12% of the entire electorate swung from one candidate to another in a few days. Wow.

 

You are – I’m sure – as entertained about the October 27 Irish presidential election as I am. Er… Well, anyway…

There are a record seven candidates this time around, and the majority are nominal independents: Mary Davis (Ind), Seán Gallagher (Ind), Michael Higgins (Labour), Martin McGuinness (Sinn Féin), Gay Mitchell (Fine Gael), David Norris (Ind), and Dana Rosemary Scallon (Ind).

Of the independents, Davis is a centrist former organizer of the Special Olympics, Gallagher is best known as a Dragons’ Den panellist, Norris is a left-leaning openly gay Senator, and Dana is, well, Dana – former Eurovision winner, MEP, and social conservative who usually provides the lion’s share of giggles when she runs for office.

What’s notable about the contest, candidate-wise, is how it does and doesn’t mirror the recent general election results.

Back in February, the Irish unceremoniously turfed the governing Fianna Fáil-Green coalition, eliminating the Greens from the Dáil entirely and giving FF its worst result ever. A large number of independents were elected, and the current Fine Gael-Labour coalition government has a massive majority in the Dáil. I approved of the result because, you might say, my instinctive bias is anti-Fianna Fáil.

Appropriate, then, to see a large number of independents in the race and – after ringing its hands for several weeks – FF failed to even nominate a candidate.

Well, sort of.

Lo and behold, it turns out that Gallagher has been involved with FF forever and is a former member of the party’s national executive, so in fact if not in name there is a Fianna Fáil candidate as far as I’m concerned.

This didn’t bother me when a) I wasn’t aware and b) the early polls hinted at a very different result. Initially it was Norris, the civil rights campaigner, who led, and those of us who like left-leaning gay Irish senators could easily envision a scenario in which Norris could win on Labour, Fine Gael, and indie transfers.

To the disappointment of his early supporters, Norris’ campaign has proven to be a bit of a train wreck. Is he in? Is he out? Does he lack sound judgement, or is he just a very poor campaigner? After seeming likely to win the Oireachtas support (20 TDs or senators) needed for nomination, Norris withdrew after a scandal surrounding his writing a letter asking for clemency for a former partner who had been convicted of the statutory rape of a fifteen-year-old Palestinian boy.

But then, with multiple polls showing Norris in the lead, he re-entered the race and managed to get enough support from local councils to be nominated. However, Norris’ questionable decisions and the uncertainty of his campaign caused his poll results to plummet by something like 20 points.

Which takes us to two recent polls, published October 16 by RED C and Quantum Research.

RED C: Gallagher 39%, Higgins 27%, McGuinness 13%, Mitchell 8%, Norris 7%, Davis 4%, Scallon 2%
Quantum: Higgins 36%, Gallagher 29%, McGuinness 13%, Norris 10%, Mitchell 6%, Davis 4%, Scallon 2%

It does strike me as stunning that Gay Mitchell, despite being the lead governing party’s nominee, and FG doing well in opinion polls, can only muster single-digit support. Norris is clearly down, but then so is McGuinness, it would seem, and that’s good news. The Quantum poll doesn’t bother me; Higgins would be my second pick after Norris, for whom I have a soft spot, and it’s easy to see how Labour’s guy could get elected on second preference votes from Norris, Mitchell, and Davis.

But WTF is up with the surge for Gallagher?

My initial reaction was that Gallagher – who, after all, is known as an entrepreneur – had bought his way into popularity. Fianna Fáil’s nominal reason (besides the embarrassment of another big loss) for not nominating its own candidate was that the party lacked funds, and hearing about Gallagher’s FF links, I assumed blithely that FF had encouraged him to run as a independent and spend his own money.

However, several blogs have pointed out that Gallagher filed tax returns indicating an income of a mere 12,000 euros (about $18,000), so first, how is Gallagher a successful entrepreneur, and second, who’s funding his campaign? [Note more recent news items about fundraisers for Gallagher featuring none other than former FF Taoiseach Brian Cowen.]

But even more so, I have to ask, Ireland, what the hell are you thinking? You finally turfed the dreaded Fianna Fáil from government, so why would you consider electing a FF insider? Are you daft? Are you blinded by the shine off Gallagher’s pate? Are you that impressed by Gallagher’s being on the telly?

Norris, as Norris himself would have it, is indeed the true independent in the race. Davis is tarnished by a long career of making a living off quangos to which she was named by FF, and for heaven’s sake, Gallagher essentially quit FF in order to run as an independent.

Only 17% cast their first preference votes for FF in the February election. Even if the Quantum poll is the best barometer, that means another 10% of the populace is that impressed by Seán Gallagher, failed businessman, tacky TV panellist, and (I repeat) Fianna Fáil insider.

What a dream come true for FF. They spend no money, they don’t campaign, and in the end they get to keep the presidency. So the outgoing president, Mary McAleese, is Fianna Fáil, but by all accounts McAleese has been an apolitical president, comparable to her Labour-nominated predecessor Mary Robinson, considered by many to be the finest Irish president in history. But I don’t think Seán Gallagher is a Mary McAleese or a Mary Robinson by any stretch of the imagination.

Ireland’s financial collapse has led inexorably to a shake-up of its political scene, and I suppose the poll volatility is a reflection of the country’s fluid partisan identification – whereas in the past, the largest single bloc of voters would vote in a donkey (or even Charles Haughey) if he or she were Fianna Fáil, that’s not the case now.

So why, in less than a year, would Ireland fall back into its old, stagnant, stale, corrupt habit of choosing one of the Soldiers of Destiny as its president? The mind boggles.

For what it’s worth, I’d vote Norris, Higgins, Davis, Mitchell in that order and would rather gouge my eyes out with a grapefruit spoon or attend a Fianna Fáil Ard Fheis than preference Gallagher, McGuinness, or Scallon. Well, maybe I’d rank Dana for a larf.

I figure that would get Ireland a Labour president, and that’s not so bad a result, even if Higgins does look like a hobbit.

Fianna Fáil in an independent’s clothing #aras11

You are – I’m sure – as entertained about the October 27 Irish presidential election as I am. Er… Well, anyway…

There are a record seven candidates this time around, and the majority are nominal independents: Mary Davis (Ind), Seán Gallagher (Ind), Michael Higgins (Labour), Martin McGuinness (Sinn Féin), Gay Mitchell (Fine Gael), David Norris (Ind), and Dana Rosemary Scallon (Ind).

Of the independents, Davis is a centrist former organizer of the Special Olympics, Gallagher is best known as a Dragons’ Den panellist, Norris is a left-leaning openly gay Senator, and Dana is, well, Dana – former Eurovision contestant, MEP, and social conservative who usually provides the lion’s share of giggles when she runs for office.

What’s notable about the contest, candidate-wise, is how it does and doesn’t mirror the recent general election results.

Back in February, the Irish unceremoniously turfed the governing Fianna Fáil-Green government, eliminating the Greens from the Dáil entirely and giving FF its worst result ever. A large number of independents were elected, and the current Fine Gael-Labour coalition government has a massive majority in the Dáil. I approved of the result because, you might say, my instinctive bias is anti-Fianna Fáil.

Appropriate, then, to see a large number of independents in the race and – after ringing its hands for several weeks – FF failed to even nominate a candidate.

Well, sort of.

Lo and behold, it turns out that Gallagher has been involved with FF forever and is a former member of the party’s national executive, so in fact if not in name there is a Fianna Fáil candidate as far as I’m concerned.

This didn’t bother me when a) I wasn’t aware and b) the early polls hinted at a very different result. Initially it was Norris, the civil rights campaigner, who led, and those of us who like left-leaning gay Irish senators could easily envision a scenario in which Norris could win on Labour, Fine Gael, and indie transfers.

To the disappointment of his early supporters, Norris’ campaign has proven to be a bit of a train wreck. Is he in? Is he out? Is he scandalous? Or is he just a very poor campaigner? After seeming likely to win the Oireachtas support (20 TDs or senators) needed for nomination, Norris withdrew after a scandal surrounding his writing a letter asking for clemency for a former partner who had been convicted of the statutory rape of a fifteen-year-old Palestinian boy.

But then, you see, with multiple polls showing Norris in the lead, he re-entered the race and managed to get enough support from local councils to be nominated. However, Norris’ questionable judgement and the uncertainty of his campaign caused his poll results to plummet by something like 20 points.

Which takes us to two recent polls, published October 16 by RED C and Quantum Research.

RED C: Gallagher 39%, Higgins 27%, McGuinness 13%, Mitchell 8%, Norris 7%, Davis 4%, Scallon 2%
Quantum: Higgins 36%, Gallagher 29%, McGuinness 13%, Norris 10%, Mitchell 6%, Davis 4%, Scallon 2%

It does strike me as stunning that Gay Mitchell, despite being the lead governing party’s nominee, and FG doing well in opinion polls, can only muster single-digit support. Norris is clearly down, but then so is McGuinness, it would seem, and that’s good news. The Quantum poll doesn’t bother me; Higgins would be my second pick after Norris, for whom I have a soft spot, and it’s easy to see how Labour’s guy could get elected on second preference votes from Norris, Mitchell, and Davis.

But WTF is up with the surge for Gallagher?

My initial reaction was that Gallagher – who, after all, is known as an entrepreneur – had bought his way into popularity. Fianna Fáil’s nominal reason (besides the embarrassment of another big loss) for not nominating its own candidate was that the party lacked funds, and hearing about Gallagher’s FF links, I assumed blithely that FF had encouraged him to run as a independent and spend his own money.

However, several blogs have pointed out that Gallagher filed tax returns indicating an income of a mere 12,000 euros (about $18,000), so first, how the hell is Gallagher a successful entrepreneur, and second, who’s funding his campaign?

But even more so, I have to ask, Ireland, what the hell are you thinking? You finally turfed the dreadful Fianna Fáil from government, so why would you consider electing a FF insider? Are you daft? Are you blinded by the shine off Gallagher’s pate? Are you that impressed by Gallagher’s being on the telly?

Norris, as Norris himself would have it, is indeed the true independent in the race. Davis is tarnished by a long career of making a living off quangos to which she was named by FF, and for heaven’s sake, Gallagher essentially quit FF in order to run as an independent.

Only 17% cast their first preference votes for FF in the February election. Even if the Quantum poll is the best barometer, that means another 10% of the populace is that impressed by Seán Gallagher, failed businessman, tacky TV panellist, and (I repeat) Fianna Fáil insider.

What a dream come true for FF. They spend no money, they don’t campaign, and in the end they get to keep the presidency. So the outgoing president, Mary McAleese, is Fianna Fáil, but by all accounts McAleese has been an apolitical president, comparable to her Labour-nominated predecessor Mary Robinson, considered by many to be the finest Irish president in history. But I don’t think Seán Gallagher is a Mary McAleese by any stretch of the imagination.

Ireland’s financial collapse has led inexorably to a shake-up of its political scene, and I suppose the poll volatility is a reflection of the country’s fluid partisan identification – whereas in the past, the largest single bloc of voters would vote in a donkey (or even Charles Haughey) if he or she were Fianna Fáil, that’s not the case now.

So why, in less than a year, would Ireland fall back into its old, stagnant, stale, corrupt habit of choosing one of the Soldiers of Destiny as its president? The mind boggles.

For what it’s worth, I’d vote Norris, Higgins, Davis, Mitchell in that order and would rather gouge my eyes out with a grapefruit spoon or attend a Fianna Fáil Ard Fheis than preference Gallagher, McGuinness, or Scallon. Well, maybe I’d rank Dana for a larf.

I figure that would get Ireland a Labour president, and that’s not so bad a result, even if Higgins does look like a hobbit.